51,347 page views this month35,687 readers this month
GoCardless
Analyst Index

Who called it right?

Tech analysts forecast markets for a living. We track the calls they make in public, check each one against what actually happened and rank them on how often they get it right

0
Analysts ranked
3
Predictions scored
25
Still to fall due
–
Average accuracy
#AnalystAccuracyPredictionsVerdictsBest call
–Anthony Frot
Anthony FrotResearch director, CONTEXTNot yet ranked
32%
2we should see still a positive growth in Q1 8% and phasing a bit down…
–Jay McBain
Jay McBainChief analyst, US, Omdia (was Canalys, Forrester)Not yet ranked
30%
1Anthropic is going to IPO itself into a potential multi-trillion…
–Steve Hall
Steve HallChief AI officer, ISGNot yet ranked
–
0–
–Larry Walsh
Larry WalshCEO and chief analyst, Channelnomics (was The 2112 Group)Not yet ranked
–
0–
–Alastair Edwards
Alastair EdwardsChief analyst, Omdia (was Canalys)Not yet ranked
–
0–
–Robin Ody
Robin OdyResearch director, MSP, Omdia (was Canalys)Not yet ranked
–
0–
RightMostly rightHalf rightMostly wrongWrongRanked once 3 predictions have been scored
Latest verdicts
Mostly wrong · 25%
Anthropic is going to IPO itself into a potential multi-trillion dollar value in the upcoming days.Jay McBain · made Jun 2026 · Anthropic had only filed confidentially (1 June 2026).
Full verdict →
Wrong · 0%
we'll still think a growth of 1%Anthony Frot · made Feb 2026 · Q2 2026 revenue through European distribution grew about 12% year on year, the first double-digit quarter since Q1… Scored on CONTEXT’s own figures.
Full verdict →
How we scoreShow

1. Find the call

Public predictions from the last five years in VETTDD’s categories: reports, press releases, keynotes, interviews. Each one is quoted and linked.

2. Wait for the deadline

A prediction is only scored once its date has passed. Until then it’s listed as pending.

3. Check what happened

Against independent evidence where it exists: company results, filings, other firms’ data. Where none exists, we score on the analyst’s firm’s own figures and put a caveat on the verdict. Each verdict links its sources.

Right100%Mostly right75%Half right50%Mostly wrong25%Wrong0%

4. Weigh it

Calls looking more than two years ahead count one and a half. Calls made under six months out, or when the outcome was close to certain, count half. Trend calls with nothing to measure count half again, so nobody climbs the table by being vague or stating the obvious.

Growth-rate forecasts are scored on how many percentage points they missed by: within 1 point is Right, 2.5 Mostly right, 5 Half right, 10 Mostly wrong; further out, or growth called when the market fell, is Wrong. Other number forecasts are scored on how far off they were: within 10% of the actual figure is Right, within 25% Mostly right; further out, Half right if it moved the right way, otherwise Wrong. Small samples: until an analyst has many verdicts, their accuracy is pulled towards the table average, as if they had 5 more average calls, so a handful of lucky calls can’t top the table. No independent evidence: the verdict is scored on the analyst’s firm’s own figures and carries a caveat. Analysts can reply to any verdict.